Simultaneous elections could lead to significant savings in resources like security personnel, polling staff, and election materials.
The cost of Lok Sabha elections in India has increased significantly, rising from Rs 10.5 crore in the first election of 1951-52 to Rs 50,000 crore in 2019.
Streamlined processes could reduce the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) operational costs.
Governance Continuity
Frequent elections often lead to “policy paralysis” as governments focus on short-term electoral gains. ONOE could mitigate this issue, enabling governments to implement long-term policies without interruptions from the Model Code of Conduct.
Reduced resource strain, constant campaigning, and corruption could result in better governance outcomes.
Reduced Disruptions
Fewer elections mean fewer disruptions to public life, including the functioning of educational institutions often used as polling stations.
Teachers and other government service holders engaged in election duties would face fewer disruptions in their primary responsibilities, enhancing administrative efficiency.
Increased Voter Participation
Supporters argue that simultaneous elections may reduce “election fatigue,” potentially leading to higher voter turnout and engagement.
Streamlined Campaigns
Political parties could benefit from concentrated campaign efforts, allowing smaller parties a better chance to compete effectively.
Economic Benefits
The Kovind Committee report indicates that India’s national real GDP growth could be 1.5% higher in the year following simultaneous elections.
Fewer elections might reduce the influx of black money and pressure on businesses for political donations. During the 18th Lok Sabha elections, the ECI seized Rs 10,000 crore.
Improved Election Monitoring
The concentrated nature of simultaneous elections might facilitate better election monitoring, ensuring greater transparency and fairness.
Share on WhatsApp